Session: DTM-02: Design Methods and Practice

Paper Number: 143793

143793 - Reverse Engineering Through a Product Teardown Activity and Component-Function Identification 

Engineering educators have used reverse engineering activities as a pedagogical tool for decades. Product teardowns allow students to experientially learn how a product works and what components lie hidden inside of an engineered product. These activities help shape students’ mental models and bolster their systems thinking abilities. This study examines the impact of a product teardown activity on upper-level engineering students’ mental models of everyday products. Students’ mental models of three common products were measured through a direct elicitation method before and after taking apart a hair dryer. In addition, students identified the system’s components and assigned functionality to each. Results suggest no change in observed score between pre and post mental models for any of the three tested products, which implies that knowledge transfer is not occurring. In addition, the product teardown activity is shown to have a positive impact on component identification, but a negative impact on functional reasoning. Specifically, improvements in motor inclusion are observed, which suggests that a product teardown activity helps break from existing schema (treating a fan-motor assembly as a single component) that lead to erroneous mental models. These findings illustrate the importance of reverse engineering on the development of robust mental models of engineered systems, but also show a negative impact on functional reasoning and no evidence of knowledge transfer between systems as was otherwise expected. The results of the study build on prior work by providing a more nuanced analysis of the specific components and functions included on mental model representations of common products.  The implications of these findings, comparisons to prior literature, and a description of future work are discussed.

Presenting Author: Alexander Murphy Florida Polytechnic University

Presenting Author Biography: Dr. Alexander Murphy currently an assistant professor at Florida Polytechnic University. Before this position, he held a Research Associate appointment at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). He was awarded an ASEE eFellows fellowship funded by NSF for the postdoctoral research position at UTD. He completed my Ph.D. in mechanical engineering in July of 2021 at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia. In Spring of 2018, he was awarded an NSF GRFP fellowship in STEM Education and Learning Research. His research areas include engineering design theory, design methodology, design cognition, design education and engineering education. His current research is focused on exploring how system representation affects engineering designer behavior, how trained facilitation impacts the design process, and how experience affects students’ approaches to CAD modeling.

Authors:

Mikala Furiato Florida Polytechnic University
Alexander Murphy Florida Polytechnic University